Sleazy and Restoring

[picture from Flickr — thanks, bradlauster!]
David Smay sent me a link to a lovely long article in the Guardian about using unusual words: From albedo to zugunruhe, in which the author, James Meek, talks about words he hasn't known and his own uneasiness about using rarer (but more exact) words.
It also has this great quote in it:

The point at which a man starts finding discrepancies in dictionaries is probably the point at which he should go for a long holiday to a place that is sleazy and restoring.

My take (and yes, I know it's self-serving, in that I make dictionaries) is that, in belletristic writing, when presented with an otherwise-equal choice between a fun, unusual word, and a boring, commonplace word, you should always choose the unusual one. Why deny your readers the "aha!" moment of finding a perfectly apt, elegantly descriptive word?
(Of course, I also think "when in doubt, wear orange," so you perhaps should take this with a grain of salt.)
Literary writing is a way to introduce readers not just to facts and ideas and emotions but to beautiful words: imagine writing a guidebook to a place that left out the best restaurants because they weren't on the subway line … if something is worthwhile, people will find a way to get there. If a word is perfect, people will figure it out.
I am NOT suggesting that technical or workaday writing should be full of fifty-cent words; "This way to the egress" is a scam, not an invitation to learning. (Or, at least, not an invitation to learning that is received gratefully!) But literature, long-form journalism, and essay writing allow for more lexical scope, and you should take advantage of it, to the best of your ability. Why not?



3 thoughts on “Sleazy and Restoring

  1. Thanks for posting the link to the article, Erin. I loved the article and looked up all the words I didn’t know or wasn’t sure about on my Mac. Would you believe one of them came up blank? (I blame you, of course. How could you not include eirenicon?! Actually, that one I can live without.)


  2. I heartily concur, Erin. The purpose of this vast vocabulary is to use it and convey MORE. I fought mightily with a college professor over usage in an essay that she complained sounded too much like The New York Times Magazine. The word “threefold” somehow put her over the edge. I defended it, but her disgust at what she viewed as pretension left me with a B in the class. I honestly think it was spite. Oh well, it didn’t stop me!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s